ATLS is actually an effective 20-goods level consisting of a couple of balances, perceptions to the lesbians (ATL) and you will gay people (ATG)

This study belongs to a wide little bit of search with the class interactions and associated thinking for the additional social teams. All of the people was in fact checked out immediately following giving the agree in writing. Respondents was indeed in hopes privacy to-do a couple of paper-and-pencil questionnaires to your ATLG measures physically. Volunteers received more borrowing products for their way degrees. Brand new ethical standards of the Chilean Search Payment (CONICYT) was indeed adopted.

As well, political thinking-categorization (asking regarding the political preferences coded toward about three groups: remaining, cardiovascular system and you can right) and you will sexual orientation were included

People responded group issues to check on ATLG validity: gender, years, socioeconomic position (large, middle and you can lower levels were utilized), and you will faith identification using care about-reporting into the answer to the question “Do you really believe your self a spiritual individual?” At exactly the same time, good 4-item measure level toward a six-part Likert size concerning your pros members give to the religious ideas in their every single day lifestyle was applied.

It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations https://datingranking.net/it/incontri-con-un-genitore-single/ before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r ₍₅₀₃₎ = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).

Higher (near to 6) scores presented better bias, and you can reduced score advertised positive thinking into the homosexuals

An element of the mission would be to dictate the underlying ATLG grounds framework. So, three grounds designs was in fact projected: a one-basis model (ATLG includes a single homophobia cause of and that all of the situations saturate); a-two-foundation coordinated model (one or two proportions manufactured because of the ATL and you can ATG subscales whose issues is saturate on the corresponding grounds was advised) and a second purchase model that have one or two correlated activities (in which ATG subscale situations would saturate in two size – homosexual Values and you may Nature – and those of one’s ATL size do saturate about almost every other three – lesbian Old-fashioned Thinking, and you will Personal Approve and you can Social Rights). These types of five dimensions was indeed extracted from analyses carried out in early in the day education (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).

As a whole, the newest fit is better whenever design issues are improved. Thus, the 2-factor second-order design is considered the most parsimonious for everybody indexes gotten. CFI (Comparative Boost List) and you can NFI (Regular Match List) spiders reveal beliefs over 0.9, all of them thought to be pretty good (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Cousin Develop Directory) value approaches 0.nine, particularly in the five-factor design. At the same time, RMSEA (Options Mean square Error regarding Approximation) index was tall which have viewpoints lower than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), for this reason confirming a knowledgeable fit of the five-factor model.

Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).